THE MICHIGAN ASH MONITORING PROJECT:  EVALUATING MICHIGAN’S ASH RESOURCE
SARAH E. BRODEUR-CAMPBELL1, JESSICA A. METZGER1, JOHN A. WITTER2, ANDREW J. STORER1
1 SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, HOUGHTON MI  49931
2 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR MI
Objective: Evaluate the health and sustainability of the ash resource in Michigan before, during, and after the spread of emerald ash borer through the range of ash (Fraxinus spp).
•Characterize changes in the forest matrix caused by the spread of an invasive forest pest with the capability to remove its host tree from the landscape.
•
•Characterize interactions among emerald ash borer and native pests and diseases.
Methods: Eighty (80) plots marked using GPS and laid out using standardized transects with 15 ash trees measured per transect.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for this project comes from the USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry.  Our thanks to Seri Robinson, Terrence Smith, Matt Abbotts, Helana Nelson, Rob Benson, and Eric VanWormer for help with data collection.
1        2        3         4         5        6        7          8
9      10      11       12       13       14       15
Typical plot layout.  Numbers indicate prism point number.
           = witness point,        = prism point, and         = vegetation circle & soil collection point
22 m
4 m
2.27 m radius
Non-ash tree
Ash tree
The image “file:///H:/ash%20monitoring%20project/esc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
Results of ANOVA run on tree data values:
• Significant site*species interactions:
•
• Vigor - site quality for that species.
• DBH and height -  general tree size differs depending on species response at each site.
• Foliage transparency -  leaf production differs depending on species response at each site.
• Significant differences among species independently of site:
•
•Crown density - depends on species.
•
• Significant differences among sites independently of species:
•
• ULCR, density, and light exposure may be functions of site openness.
•Affected by site management and stand density.
• Crown dieback -  intra-site factors like age or disease may be affecting all ash at a particular site.
•
• No significant differences between sites or between species:
•
• Crown class - similar functional role and position of different ash species in the canopy at each site.
•
Overall Ash Condition
Overall health in UP is good.
• Vigor averages:  1.32 to 1.48, with standard error between 0.04-0.05.
•All three species of ash perform well when on suitable sites.
•
The apparent health of ash may present challenges to the establishment of emerald ash borer in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
•Beetles may be less successful in attacking healthy, vigorous trees in rural forests and this may reduce the density of beetles.
•Ash trees widespread, but patchy in location and therefore escapes from the beetle are possible.
Green, white, and black ash are shown by appropriately colored bars.  SE is indicated by error bars.  P-values are given for significant differences between species for each value.  * indicates significant site*species interaction.  St indicates that site was a significant factor.  Sp indicates that species was a significant factor.
St & Sp, P = <0.0001
St, P = <0.0001
St, P = <0.0001
*,  P = <0.0001
St, P = <0.0001
*,  P = 0.0056
*, P = <0.0001
*, P = 0.0003
Tree-level measurements include:
•Height (m)
•DBH (cm)
•Uncompacted live crown ratio (ULCR; % of tree)
•Crown density (%)
•Crown foliage transparency (%)
•Crown dieback (%)
•Light exposure (number of sides)
•Vigor (category; 1 = healthy to 6 = dead)
•Crown class (category; 1 = open grown to 5 = suppressed)
Summary data values by species