| Ash Reduction Model (Metric) 2 cm Diameter
  Class |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   | Version
  1.1b, Tara L. Eberhart, Andrew J. Storer, Linda M. Nagel |  | 
	        
			   | Copyright
  Michigan Technological University |  | Version 1.1b Input
  Requirements |  | 
	        
			   | 9/25/2006 |  |  |  | ASH Trees Only |  | 
	        
			   |  |  | Trees per Acre |  | 
	        
			   |  |  | This information should
  be available from stand and stock tables. |  | 
	        
			   |  | Note: this model version
  is in METRIC units |  | 
	        
			   |  | 
	        
			   |  | 2cm Size Class Increments |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | DBH Class cm | No.
  Trees/Acre | % Surface Area |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Retaining Small Trees |  | 
	        
			   |  | 8 |  |  |  |  | Target Percentages |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Diameter Limit Cut |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 99% |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95% |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 16 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90% |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75% |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | *Cutting all ash down to this size
  limit |  | 
	        
			   |  | 22 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 24 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 26 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 28 |  |  |  |  | Retaining Large Trees |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 30 |  |  |  |  |  | Target Percentages |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 32 |  |  |  |  | Diameter Limit Cut |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | 99% |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 36 |  |  |  |  | 95% |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 38 |  |  |  |  | 90% |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 40 |  |  |  |  | 75% |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 42 |  |  |  |  | * Cutting all ash up to
  this size limit |  | 
	        
			   |  | 44 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 46 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 48 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 50 |  |  |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 52 |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 54 |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 56 |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 58 |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | Total |  |  |  | 
	        
			   |  | 
	        
			   | Summary |  | 
	        
			   | This
  version of the model serves to show what diameter limit cut would be needed
  in order to reduce the total surface area of ash trees in a stand by a
  desired amount. |  | 
	        
			   | Over 500
  ash trees have had their specific morphology recorded to estimate total
  surface area which is a good indicator of total phloem available to emerald
  ash borer. |  | 
	        
			   | Ash
  species, growing conditions, and phloem widths will be incorporated in future
  models. |  | 
	        
			   | This model
  only works with the ash component of a stand regardless of total stand size,
  other tree species presence, or how much ash there is present. |  | 
	        
			   |  | 
	        
			   | Depending
  on management goals, this model can be used to determine a lower diameter
  limit cut to retain small trees, |  | 
	        
			   | and an
  upper diameter limit cut to retain large trees. Surface area can be used as
  an estimate of phloem, a critical resource, available to |  | 
	        
			   | emerald
  ash borer in a stand. Use of this model in management decisions will reduce
  the ash resource available to emerald ash borer |  | 
	        
			   | by a target
  percentage and help maintain ash as a component in our forests and its
  genetic diversity |  | 
	        
			   |  | 
	        
			   | Note:
  surface area reduction will reduce the amount of breeding substrate (phloem)
  in the stand by a target level, |  | 
	        
			   | thereby
  reducing the population potential of eab, not ensuring remaining ash to be
  uninfested |  | 
	        
			   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |